Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Patten #464388 v. Braman
as 1:2023cv00662
Petitioner:
Zachary Michael Patten #464388
Respondent:
Melinda Braman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Patten #227914 v. Huss et al
as 2:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Patten #227914
Defendant:
Erica Huss, Danielle Carlson and Brenda James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eggert v. Patten et al
as 1:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
C. Lee Eggert
Defendant:
Z. Cartter Patten and W.A. Bryan Patten
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02754
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Van Patten et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv04438
Plaintiff:
Danielle Van Patten and Robert Van Patten
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Patten v. Ann Arbor, City of, et al
as 5:2015cv14279
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Patten
Defendant:
Ann Arbor, City of and The Ann Arbor Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Viola Chambers v. HSBC Bank USA, National Assoc, et al
as 14-1606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIOLA CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. ("MERS"), OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and others
Defendant:
RANDALL S. MILLER & ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
