Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lawrence Rawson v. Bryan Morrison
as 21-2841
Petitioner / Appellant: LAWRENCE RAWSON
Respondent / Appellee: BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00832
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rawson v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00973
Plaintiff: Bernise Irene Rawson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rawson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01329
Plaintiff: Andrew Jackson Rawson
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00016
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rawson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02192
Plaintiff: Connie Louise Rawson
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3655
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tatum v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv00210
Plaintiff: Adam Jerome Tatum
Defendant: City of Chattanooga, Tennessee , Officer Latoya Tate-Olk , Officer Daryl Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01354
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Herman Miller, Inc. v. The King's Mark, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00411
Plaintiff: Herman Miller, Inc.
Defendant: The King's Mark, LLC , Cube King, Inc. , Office Furniture Discounters, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?