Cases 1 - 10 of 441
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Outland v. Peek et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Rodger Outland
Defendant:
Nurse Shelia Peek, Cindy Wortham, WKCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Reviert et al
as 2:2023cv13211
Plaintiff:
Eric Keith Rodgers
Defendant:
Reviert, Carol Walker, Adam Douglas and others
Rodgers v. Fenton Area Public Schools et al
as 2:2023cv13110
Plaintiff:
Kelly Rodgers
Defendant:
Fenton Area Public Schools, Gearup2lead, Adam Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Yazan Abdul-Latif
as 23-6043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
YAZAN ARAFAT ABDUL-LATIF, aka Ryan Rodgers
Rodgers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03924
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rodgers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Ramey et al
as 0:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rodger E. Williams and Willow Williams
Defendant:
Betsy Ramey, Ferguson, President of WellPath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finney v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03708
Plaintiff:
Rodger Finney
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kiebler v. Northville Public Schools et al
as 2:2023cv12801
Plaintiff:
Sean Kiebler
Defendant:
Northville Public Schools, Katie Booth, David Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Elizalde v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv12526
Plaintiff:
Robert Elizalde
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Genesee County, Deputy Kristopher Pavlica and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
