Cases 1 - 10 of 258
Neal v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02499
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Neal
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02125
Plaintiff:
Rosemary James
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 2:2024cv02257
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rosemary Durham Covey
Garnishee:
Morgan Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Connor et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Ann Connor and Donald James Connor
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1996
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bellman #314047 v. Mikel et al
as 1:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Randy Bellman #314047
Defendant:
Nathan Mikel, Unknown Oullette, Unknown McIntosh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. City of Norwood Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Yvonne E. Collins
Defendant:
City of Norwood Ohio, Ryan Harrison, Officer Kim Brucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Townsend #201112 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Townsend #201112
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Suzanne Groff, Rosemary Villasan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
