Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brittany Hyre Anculle, et al v. USA
as 22-5494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE, JAMES H. BARNES, LISA M. BATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anculle et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Kraujalis, Priscilla A. Blackburn, Malibu K. Messer and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Damien Sublett v. Justin Bryant, et al
as 16-6111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN SUBLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN T. BRYANT, Correctional Officer - Northpoint Training Center, BRAD ADAMS, Correctional Officer - Northpoint Training Center, JAMIE MORELAND, Correctional Officer - Northpoint Training Center and others
Simons v. State of Tennessee and the Tennessee Board of Paroles et al
as 1:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Barry P. Simons
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and the Tennessee Board of Paroles, Tennessee Thirty First (31st) Judicial District, Bart Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sublett v. Bryant
as 5:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Damien A. Sublett
Defendant:
Justin T. Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Goodman
as 1:2011cv01131
Plaintiff:
William T. Bryant
Defendant:
Danny H. Goodman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Johnson
as 3:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
William T. Bryant
Defendant:
Harry Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Goodman
as 3:2011cv00374
Plaintiff:
William T. Bryant
Defendant:
Danny H. Goodman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bean et al v. Teague et al
as 3:2010cv00440
Plaintiff:
Robert Bean , Jacquleen Axley , Carl S Bivins and others
Defendant:
Steve Teague and Monroe County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rickels v. Cupp et al
as 3:2007cv01987
Plaintiff:
Romane J. Rickels
Defendant:
R. Cupp, S. Shaw, T. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
