Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Talmadge v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03993
Plaintiff:
Danielle E. Talmadge
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Livingston v. Jay Livingston Music, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00780
Plaintiff:
Tammy Livingston
Defendant:
Jay Livingston Music, Inc., Randy Talmadge and Travilyn Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Talmadge v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 2:2021cv11745
Plaintiff:
Giovanna Talmadge
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cody v. USA
as 2:2020cv00188
Petitioner:
Talmadge G Cody
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Talmadge CodyIn re: Talmadge Cody
as 20-5627
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: TALMADGE CODY
Jackson-Bolinger et al v. Americore Health, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv00152
Defendant:
The Pineville Community Hospital Administrative Services Agreement Health Care Plan, HD Cannington, Estate of John Garfield Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa North, Amy Jackson-Bolinger and Pamela Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Jackson-Bolinger et al v. Americore Health, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00450
Defendant:
The Pineville Community Hospital Administrative Services Agreement Health Care Plan, HD Cannington, Estate of John Garfield Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa North, Amy Jackson-Bolinger and Pamela Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Barnes v. USA
as 1:2019cv11774
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Talmadge Derrell Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Talmadge Barne
as 17-1744
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TALMADGE DERRELL BARNES
Joseph Scott v. Jeanette Thompson, et al
as 17-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANETTE THOMPSON, SCOTT TALMADGE, TIM CONGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
