Cases 1 - 10 of 12
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Jodi Fleming v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company, et al
as 19-3567
Defendant / Appellee:
CEO RANDALL STEPHENSON, JAMES TENCH, Senior Manager, WILLIAM A. BLASE, JR., Vice President of Human Resources and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JODI D. FLEMING
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiner v. Metro Health Medical Center et al
as 1:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
Carlthea Stiner
Defendant:
Metro Health Medical Center, Natalie M. Joseph, Stephen W. Tarmarkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company et al
as 1:2013cv02692
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Johnson
Defendant:
Ohio Bell Telephone Company and James Tench
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
D'Nanekai Carrigan-Terrell v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 13-4407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D'NANEKAI CARRIGAN-TERRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR, JENNIE TRIM, NALLURI and others
Carrigan-Terrell v. Mohr et al
as 2:2012cv00215
Plaintiff:
D'Nanekai Carrigan-Terrell
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Jennie Trim, Doctor Nalluri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
