Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Timothy Crane v. Chad Palmiter, et al
as 24-1636
Defendant:
CHAD PALMITER, Undersheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as Correctional Officer John Doe, official and personal capacity, ROBERT MENDHAM, Sheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDREW CRANE, aka Timothy Andrew Lee Crane
Timothy Crane v. Chad Palmiter, et al
as 24-1625
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as Correctional Officer John Doe, official and personal capacity, ROBERT MENDHAM, Sheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity, CHAD PALMITER, Undersheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDREW CRANE, aka Timothy Andrew Lee Crane
Crane v. Palmiter et al
as 1:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Crane
Defendant:
Chad Palmiter, Robert Mendham, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchinson v. Reed
as 5:2021cv00043
Defendant:
Donnie Reed
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchinson v. Amberg et al
as 5:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Hutchinson
Defendant:
Brook Amberg, Graves County Circuit Court, John J. Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Kinney et al
as 3:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Det. f/n/u Kinney, Det. f/n/u Pryor, G Merkyl and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Crane v. Barbara Davenport, et al
as 17-1681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY CRANE, named as Timothy Andrew Lee Crane #779001
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA DAVENPORT, Mental Health Medication Provider, A. MARSHALL, Psychologist - II, BRIAN MAJERCZYK, Mental Health Unit Chief and others
USA v. Timothy Lanning
as 09-1675
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY ANDREW LANNING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
