Cases 1 - 10 of 726
Skees v. Peoples Bank
as 3:2024cv00292
Defendant:
Peoples Bank and Limestone Bank, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Skees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Bigirimana v. Atomic Transport LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Cyprien Bigirimana
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance Company, Atomic Transport LLC, Joshua Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pearson v. Washington
as 2:2024cv11179
Petitioner:
Andre DeShawn Pearson
Respondent:
Michigan, People of the State of and Raphael Washington
Chang v. Joyson Safety Systems Acquisition LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10932
Defendant:
Joyson Safety Systems Acquisition LLC, Takata Corporation, Honda Motor CO., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Yaping Chang
Peoples v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Rivera Latroy Peoples
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salami #879045 v. Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Defendant:
Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Peoples Bank of Middle Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Randall Ray Smith
Defendant:
Peoples Bank of Middle Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Peoples v. United States of America, The
as 3:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
Marquel Peoples
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
People of the State of Michigan v. Kanerva
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
RESTRICTED FILER John R. Kanerva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal- Criminal Case Re: Civil Rights
Jones v. Macauley
as 1:2024cv10734
Petitioner:
Dexter Carl Jones
Respondent:
People and Matt Macauley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
