Cases 1 - 10 of 14
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Doe et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tim Brown
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Anica Letica, One Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luminor Consulting Corp. et al v. Elmessiry et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Luminor Consulting Corp., DLC Elite Lending Corporation, Heard Concrete Construction Corp. and others
Defendant:
Dr. Adel Elmessiry and WebDBTech, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Rob Abenante, Jeff Hou Yin Ho, Anish Pabari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davis Artifacts, Inc. et al v. Repp
as 5:2019cv00354
Plaintiff:
Davis Artifacts, Inc. and Harry Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Steven Repp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Bedford County Jail
as 4:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Davis, III
Defendant:
Bedford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hamilton County Jail et al (PLR1)
as 1:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
George Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Hamilton County Jail, Hamilton County Officers, Ms Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Sircy et al
as 4:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Davis, III
Defendant:
Jerry Sircy, Tim Lokey, Bedford County Workhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Thomas Davi
as 14-5378
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS DAVIS
Carr, Sr. v. Noble et al
as 2:2013cv00762
Plaintiff:
James M. Carr, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeff Noble, Decarlo M. Blackwell, Steve Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zimmermann v. U.S. Airways, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv02059
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Zimmermann
Defendant:
Thomas Davis, US Airways, Inc. and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
