Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Oak Ridge Envlt Peace Alliance, et al v. James Perry, et al
as 19-6391
Defendant / Appellant: JAMES RICHARD PERRY, Secretary, United States Department of Energy and LISA E. GORDON-HAGERTY, Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellee: OAK RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PEACE ALLIANCE, ED SULLIVAN, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and others
Oak Ridge Envtl Peace Alliance, et al v. James Perry, et al
as 19-6332
Plaintiff / Appellee: RALPH HUTCHISON, OAK RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PEACE ALLIANCE, ED SULLIVAN and others
Defendant / Appellant: JAMES RICHARD PERRY, Secretary, United States Department of Energy and LISA E. GORDON-HAGERTY, Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration
Roshon v. Eagle Research Group, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00968
Defendant: Eagle Research Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Roshon and Stephen R. Roshon, Jr.
Interested Party: United States Department of Energy
Not Classified By Court: Robert M Kincaid
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cedar Lane Farms, Corp. v. Besancon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv01390
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Farms, Corp.
Defendant: William Besancon , Sandra Besancon and United States Department of Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gary Bullwinkel v. US DOE, et al
as 14-6200
Plaintiff - Appellant: GARY BULLWINKEL
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, STEPHEN CHU, in his official capacity as Secretary of Energy, ANTHONY CUGINI, in his official capacity as Director of the National Energy Technology Laboratory, Dept of Energy and others
In Re: Complaint of Retaliation by Former U.S. Department of Energy Senior Counterintelligence Officer Richard L. Lambert for Disclosure of Substantial Violations of Laws, Rules and Regulations; Fraud; Gross (TV1)
as 3:2013cv00352
In_re: Complaint of Retaliation by Former U.S. Department of Energy Senior Counterintelligence Officer Richard L. Lambert for Disclosure of Substantial Violations of Laws, Rules and Regulations; Fraud; Gross
Intervenor_defendant: UT-Battelle, LLC
Plaintiff: Richard L. Lambert
Intervenor: United States Department of Energy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant: Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant: Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant: Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant: Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff: Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Larry Klein, et al v. US DOE, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant: LARRY KLEIN and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and FRONTIER RENEWABLE RESOURCES, LLC
State of Ohio v. Cabot Corporation, et al
as 1:2012cv01099
Plaintiff: State of Ohio
Defendant: Cabot Corporation , CBS Operations, Inc. , The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Klein et al v. United States Department of Energy
as 2:2011cv00514
Plaintiff: Larry Klein and Sierra Club
Defendant: United States Department of Energy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?