Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Vargas v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65093
Plaintiff:
Melanie R. Vargas
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vargas v. Ashland Federal Correctional Institution
as 0:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Javier Vargas
Defendant:
Ashland Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Vargas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Luis Vargas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vincent v. Siddikov et al
as 3:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Amber Vincent
Defendant:
Navruz Siddikov, Taxir Logistics, Global Imperial Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
JCC Fulton Development, LLC v. Vargas
as 1:2023mc51501
Plaintiff:
JCC Fulton Development, LLC
Defendant:
Dr. John Vargas
Matilde Gaspar-Vargas, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3794
Petitioner:
MATILDE GASPAR-VARGAS, NORMA LETYCIA MENDOZA ZACARIAS and SULMI NAYELI GASPAR MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Vargas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02127
Plaintiff:
Arturo Vargas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Gerald K. Phillips, Jerry Phillips and Jerry Kenneth Phillips
Defendant:
Gerald George Phillips, Edwin Vargas, Michael Kenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
