Cases 1 - 10 of 2,800
Procter v. Farmington Hills Police Department
as 2:2024cv11520
Plaintiff:
Clark Procter
Defendant:
Farmington Hills Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hurst v. Auburn Hills Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv11522
Plaintiff:
Arnold Hurst
Defendant:
Auburn Hills Police Department, Moore and Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Provident Asset Management LLC
as 5:2024cv11500
Plaintiff:
Spring Hill
Defendant:
Provident Asset Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Hill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01115
Petitioner:
William Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HV Bloodstock, LLC et al v. World Wide Horse Services, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
HV Bloodstock, LLC, Glen Hill Farm, LLC and Checkmate Thoroughbreds, LLC
Defendant:
World Wide Horse Services, Inc. doing business as KC Horse Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act / Liability of Carriers - Receipts & Bills
Satterfield v. Lauderdale
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Margaret Hill Satterfield
Defendant:
Angie K. Lauderdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Tupelo Real Estate Investments, Inc. et al v. Randall et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Tupelo Real Estate Investments, Inc., WISL Investments, Inc. and LTC Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher C. Randall, Janelle D Randall, Charles E. Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Listerman v. Notting Hill LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10868
Plaintiff:
Anne Listerman
Defendant:
Notting Hill LLC, CVS Health Corporation and Woodward Detroit CVS L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.