Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Williams v. The Weinstein Company et al
as 2:2018cv10776
Plaintiff:
Terrence D. Williams
Defendant:
The Weinstein Company, Liongate Entertainment Corp, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. and others
Franchi v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00961
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Defendant:
Bob Evans Farms, Inc., Douglas N. Benham, Charles M. Elson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv01513
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. V-F Controls et al
as 3:2015cv00829
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Smith
Defendant:
V-F Controls, Jim Weinstein and Charles A. McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Weinstein, et al
as 3:2015cv00816
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Smith
Defendant:
V-F Controls, Jim Weinstein and Charles A. McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Harper v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-5763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY LOUIS HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, in her capacity as Attorney General of the United States EEOC, JACQUELINE A. BERRIEN, in her capacity as Chair of the EEOC, KATHERINE KORES, in her capacity as District Office Director of the EEOC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CH Holding Company et al v. Miller Parking Company et al
as 2:2014cv14430
Plaintiff:
CH Holding Company , Alan Ackerman and CH/BRAND PARKING ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
Miller Parking Company , James N. Miller , James N. Miller Revocable Trust uta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
