Cases 21 - 30 of 2,722
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv01347
Defendant:
Easi LLC, Actalent, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff:
Muazzez Mira
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv01350
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff:
Muazzez Mira and Actalent, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Muazzez Mira
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation and Actalent, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv01352
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation and Actalent, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Muazzez Mira
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Mira v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
Muazzez Mira
Defendant:
Actalent, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 2:2024cv00622
Defendant:
Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, Alphabet Inc., Cox Communication Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fitzhugh v. Google Trust Services LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00845
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Meta Platforms Inc, Android Industries LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl L Fitzhugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Westbrook v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv01732
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
