Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. Jeelan Muhammad, et al
as 24-1496
Plaintiff:
LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant:
JEELAN MUHAMMAD, SUSAN SHEBEL, VELINDA LLORENS and others
Kilroy Watkins v. Sandra Baptiste, et al
as 24-1738
Plaintiff:
KILROY WATKINS
Defendant:
SANDRA BAPTISTE, Detective, CITY OF HARVEY, HARVEY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Scheurich v. Ford County et al
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
David E Scheurich
Defendant:
Ford County, Ford County Sheriff's Office, Mark Doran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Truitt et al
as 1:2023cv16111
Plaintiff:
Marshawn Wright
Defendant:
Charles Truitt, Frances Milsap, Haskeemah Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. Jeelan Muhammad, et al
as 23-2371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEELAN MUHAMMAD, SUSAN SHEBEL, VELINDA LLORENS and others
Richardson v. Muhammad McCray, et al
as 1:2023cv03637
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lamont Richardson
Defendant:
Jeelan M Muhammad McCray,, Maria L Torres, Sarah O. Iguodala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree v. Muhammad et al
as 1:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Jeelan Muhammad, Susan Shebel, Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUHAMMAD v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00273
Petitioner:
RAHMAN MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Muhammad-Curtis v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv01500
Petitioner:
Lenolis Muhammad-Curtis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
