Cases 101 - 110 of 653
Jeffery Lane v. Structural Iron Workers Local No. 1 Pension Trust
as 22-1149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
STRUCTURAL IRON WORKERS LOCAL NO. 1 PENSION TRUST FUND
Clervrain et al v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fridelyne Maisoneuve, Roselaine Clerval and others
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Shelith Hansbro, Michael R. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manetirony Clervrain v. Kilolo Kijakazi, et al
as 22-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN RUSYNIAK, MICHAEL A. GARGANO, PAUL BOWLING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mark Van Vleet v. Mt. Carmel Police Department, et al
as 22-1017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK A. VAN VLEET
Defendant / Appellee:
MT. CARMEL POLICE DEPARTMENT, CASSANDRA GOLDMAN, JAMES LANE and others
LANE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
BOBIE J. LANE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00315
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Lane and Roberta Lane
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane et al
as 3:2022pq00314
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Lane and Roberta Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Sproul
as 3:2021cv01692
Petitioner:
Mark Alan Lane
Respondent:
D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CLERVRAIN et al v. KIJAKAZI et al
as 1:2021cv03036
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN, ROODE A. CLERVRAIN, SHAMEEL CLERVRAIN and others
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, DAN RUSYNIAK, MICHAEL GARGANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
