Cases 11 - 20 of 119
Lawrence H. Hobbs v. Rusten Shesky, et al
as 22-2410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE H. HOBBS, I
Defendant / Appellee:
RUSTEN SHESKY, KATHRINE SPARKS-SHESKY, FRED R. HOLZEL and others
Watkins v. Chase et al
as 2:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Derrick Watkins
Defendant:
T R Chase, T Helm, D L Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobbs v. Shesky et al
as 2:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Houston Hobbs
Defendant:
Rusten Shesky, Kathrine Sparks-Shesky, Fred R. Holzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Watkins v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Petitioner:
Derrick Watkins
Respondent:
State of Florida, T R Chase, T Helm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greyer v. Speed et al
as 2:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Stephanie F Greyer
Defendant:
Natasha Speed, Heather B's Mother, Kevin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greyer v. Helms et al
as 2:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
Stephanie F Greyer
Defendant:
Diamond Helms, Mikelle Martin, Unknown Spanish Girl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Helms v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv04172
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Helms
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Magurany et al v. Ceccarelli et al
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
David Magurany and Melissa Magurany
Defendant:
John Ceccarelli and Chris Helms Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURDETT v. STAFFORD et al
as 1:2021cv01726
Defendant:
SHANNON BURDETT, JUDITH BOWART, JACOB HOFFMAN and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN HENRY BURDETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helm v. East St Louis Police Department
as 3:2021cv00443
Defendant:
East St Louis Police Department
Plaintiff:
Latoya A. Helm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
