Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Hayes v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2020cv00944
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, J. Young, Darren Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young, et al v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00849
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc
Plaintiff:
Jolanda J Young and Mark A. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv03809
Defendant:
J M Kostanski, R Ruiz, City of Chicago, a municipal corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Will Co. Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv03251
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Young
Defendant:
Dr. Y. Kim, CCS Correct Care Solutions, Will Co. Adult Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02744
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Young
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERKINS et al
as 2:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
SHIRLEY J. YOUNG, JEFFREY D. PERKINS by his guardian and next friend STEVEN O. PERKINS, ROBERT E. YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. BUTTS
as 1:2018cv01721
Respondent:
BUTTS
Petitioner:
ISRAEL J. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. IPPEL et al
as 1:2018cv01684
Defendant:
BRUCE IPPEL and WEXFORD MEDICAL
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL J. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Awe, Kenneth v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections Region 8 Office et al
as 3:2018cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Valentine Awe
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections Region 8 Office , C.R. Day, Field Supervisor of Unit 816 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv01014
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
ISRAEL J. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
