Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Michael Winkler v. Dan Cromwell
as 23-1393
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL WINKLER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN CROMWELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CLARK v. CARTER JR et al
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
PONIE CLARK
Defendant:
ROBERT ERIC CARTER JR, FRANK VANIHEL, MIKE HERRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Winkler et al
as 1:2022cv06719
Plaintiff:
Ivan Walton
Defendant:
Ray Winkler, Jonathan Klier, Matthew Schaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CREECH v. BUSCH et al
as 4:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE CREECH
Defendant:
Cpl. TYLER BUSCH and Capt. JOHN WINKLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Gaffner et al
as 1:2022cv01319
Defendant:
Trisha Gaffner, Kingsley Keys, Mallory Brittenham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gaffner et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
Trisha Gaffner, Kingsley Keys, Mallory Brittenham and others
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Illinois State Board of Education, Illinois Department of Public Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VANDERPOOL v. CAPITAL ACCOUNTS LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. VANDERPOOL, JR.
Defendant:
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS LLC, JOHN WESLEY SHUTT, GREG NORWINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winkler v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00919
Plaintiff:
Brenda Winkler
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Hunt v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50459
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, J. Hess, J. Leonowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
