Cases 191 - 200 of 112,153
GHOLSTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GHOLSTON
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, JAEKAR TEAH and CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montez v. Aarons et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Montez Rashaad Williams
Defendant:
Aarons, Joseph Kraus, #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STEWART v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00775
Petitioner:
ROBERT STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
BRANDON K. JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hammond City of et al v. ASARCO Master Inc
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
City of Hammond, Indiana, City of Whiting, Indiana, Hammond City of and others
Defendant:
ASARCO MASTER, INC. and ASARCO Master Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6972 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Newton v. Neal
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Larry Warren Newton, Jr
Defendant:
Ron Neal
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Tweedy v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Blake Tweedy
Defendant:
Ron Heeg and Quality Correctional Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
