Cases 21 - 30 of 213
Carey, Timothy et al v. Wisconsin Elections Commission et al
as 3:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Timothy Carey, Martha Chambers, Scott Luber and others
Defendant:
Wisconsin Elections Commission and Meagan Wolfe
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lawson v. Galipeau et al.
as 3:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Carey G Lawson and Corey G Lawson
Defendant:
John Galipeau and Robert Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. GALIPEANU et al
as 1:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
CAREY G LAWSON
Defendant:
JOHN GALIPEANU and ROBERT CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HINDMAN v. CAREY et al
as 1:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
SEAN NIGEL HINDMAN
Defendant:
JOSHUA CAREY and SEAN BAUER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Chambers v. State of Indiana, et al
as 22-1828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF INDIANA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOSH CAREY and others
CHAMBERS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOSH CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Pettigrew v. Shippert et al
as 1:2021cv06312
Plaintiff:
Carey CD Pettigrew and Carey C.D. Pettigrew
Defendant:
Shippert, . Jacobs, Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettigrew v. Shippert et al
as 3:2021cv50454
Plaintiff:
Carey C.D. Pettigrew
Defendant:
Shippert, Jacobs, Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Procter v. Generac Holdings Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01342
Plaintiff:
Carey Don Procter
Defendant:
Generac Holdings Inc, Aaron Jagdfeld and York A Ragen
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nahil Khami
Pettigrew v. Shippert et al
as 2:2021cv02288
Plaintiff:
Carey CD Pettigrew
Defendant:
Shippert, . Jacobs, Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
