Cases 21 - 30 of 143
Chatman v. Obaisi et al
as 3:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
James J Chatman
Defendant:
Dr Obaisi, Lars A Gentry, Wexford Health Sources Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHATMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00916
Plaintiff:
VALERIE CHATMAN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chatman v. DG Retail, LLC
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Iva M. Chatman
Defendant:
DG Retail, LLC and DG Retail, LLC an Illinois Corporation doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHATMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06588
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CHATMAN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CHATMAN v. YAMAHA MARINE SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2021cv00074
Defendant:
YAMAHA MARINE PRECISION PROPELLERS INC. and YAMAHA MARINE SYSTEMS COMPANY INC.
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL CHATMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Chatman v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company et al
as 2:2020cv00409
Defendant:
Renzenberger, Inc., Alysha Guy, Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company and others
Plaintiff:
James Chatman
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06523
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05894
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
