Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Clubb v. Marinette County et al
as 1:2020cv01683
Defendant:
GHI Insurance Company, Jerome T Suave, Nurses 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Clubb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
OWENS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01835
Plaintiff:
DAVID OWENS
Defendant:
TODD NEAL, DORA ALLERNA, TYLEAH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teen et al v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
as 3:2019cv00195
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Keundray Kilpatrick and Antrell Teen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Scott et al
as 4:2019cv04014
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Steve Dredge, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUBBARD v. BEGUHN et al
as 1:2018cv02692
Plaintiff:
BYRON HUBBARD
Defendant:
JENNIFER FRENCH, MARY ANN WILKINSON, LARA D. MCNEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Barfell v. Aramark Correctional Services,, et al
as 18-2409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS H. L. BARFELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC and SERGEANT PARENT
HUBBARD v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv01229
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONS SERVICES, LLC, CORIZON CORRECTIONS MEDICAL CORPORATION, JOHN DOE, 1-25 and others
John Doe:
BYRON HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz v. Wexford of Indiana LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
Diana Frantz
Defendant:
Wexford of Indiana LLC, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and State of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jerry Cozart v. Aramark Correctional Services,, et al
as 17-1328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY COZART
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, Contracted Vendor at Rushville, JENNIFER BLAESING, Rehabilitation Director, GREGG SCOTT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
