Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Doe v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2018cv00503
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Milwaukee County Behavioral Health Division and Lora Dooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBERTS et al v. CLARK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2018cv00050
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, CLARK COUNTY JAIL, DIRECTOR SCOTT CONLEN and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS M. JONES, SHAWN DRIE R. PRATT and TERRELL L. ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dooley v. Troyer et al
as 3:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
Dorris L Y Dooley
Defendant:
Michelle Troyer, Callie Daniels and Elkhart County Superior Court 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOOLEY v. TROYER
as 1:2017cv04671
Plaintiff:
DORRIS LATRESE YVETTE DOOLEY
Defendant:
MICHELLE TROYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. CLARK COUNTY et al
as 4:2017cv00233
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, B. BOWER, CLARK COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOOLEY et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04217
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
PENNY R. DOOLEY and HERMAN DOOLEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EASLEY v. NOEL et al
as 4:2017cv00206
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, BOLEY, BOWER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUNNINGHAM v. NOEL et al
as 4:2017cv00142
Defendant:
C. BROCK, T. CAPEHART, A. CHILDRESS and others
Plaintiff:
BRUCE CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02277
Petitioner:
DORRIS L.Y. DOOLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02285
Petitioner:
DORRIS L.Y. DOOLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
