Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Dodson v. Carter et al
as 3:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
Lane Grant Dodson
Defendant:
Douglas Carter , David Bacon , Matthew Emenhiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Meason et al
as 3:2016cv50303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Keith McCoy
Defendant:
Alison Meason, Joseph P. Bruscato, Marilyn Hite-Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANCINI et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2016cv02048
Plaintiff:
K. C. and MARA MANCINI
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DOES 1-50, DEBRA DOTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Brooks-Albrechtsen v. City of Indianapolis, et al
as 16-2660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, POLICE MERIT BOARD and others
Mark Brooks-Albrechtsen v. City of Indianapolis, et al
as 16-2485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, POLICE MERIT BOARD and others
Wanke v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2016cv50101
Plaintiff:
Richard Wanke
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, County of Winnebago, Illinois, IL Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hite v. Masterbrand Cabinets Inc
as 2:2016cv02040
Plaintiff:
William B Hite
Defendant:
Masterbrand Cabinets Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DAVIS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, et al
as 1:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
MAJOR P. DAVIS, II
Defendant:
NICHOLAS GALICO, RICHARD HITE, JOSEPH HOGSETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAN v. LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2015mc00113
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE SARAH EVANS BARKER, CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
POTTER v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv01897
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE POTTER
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICK HITE, OFFICER DERRICK HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
