Cases 21 - 30 of 92
IMO 2020 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 3:2020mc00017
In Re:
Mark Arnold Werling, John Christopher Havill, Steven Stoy Crone and others
Soule v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00602
Petitioner:
Michael W Soule and Michael William Soule
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wadlow v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv02202
Defendant:
Jane Moskus, Brad Rogers, Michael Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Wadlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Temple et al
as 1:2019cv08476
Defendant:
Jacob Temple, Lee Zeitlin, Louis Dattomo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS, SR. v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02833
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WILLIAMS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seifreid v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01226
Plaintiff:
Megan Seifreid
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Shelith Hansbro and Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Moskus et al
as 2:2019cv02156
Defendant:
Jane Moskus, Michael Williams and Brad Rogers
Plaintiff:
Evette Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minick v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv02069
Respondent:
Michael Williams, Kwame Raoul and Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Champaign County
Petitioner:
Rebecca Minick
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marmolyo et al v. Dublin Contractors Inc et at
as 2:2019cv00502
Defendant:
James Holton, Sr, Dublin Contractos Inc and Gerald Holton, Sr
Plaintiff:
Andrew Poker, Rafaek Marmolyo and Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RHH LLC v. Madison Hotel Property Investment, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00161
Defendant:
J. Michael Williams, Purchasing Solutions International, Inc. and Madison Hotel Property Investment, LLC
Plaintiff:
RHH LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
