Cases 31 - 40 of 1,066
Pierce, Clyde v. Kijakazi, Kilolo
as 3:2023cv00764
Plaintiff:
Clyde Pierce
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
De'Adrian Boykins v. Sheri Wilson, et al
as 23-3027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DE'ADRIAN C. BOYKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERI WILSON, MARTIAL KNIESER and DUAN PIERCE, Doctor
ORR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. ALICEA et al
as 1:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. PIERCE
Defendant:
ALEX ALICEA, JASON GRIFFITH and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10495
Plaintiff:
Keisha Pierce
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pierce v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09604
Plaintiff:
Helen Pierce
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stahmann v. Menzel et al
as 2:2023cv01192
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Stahmann
Defendant:
Kristin Menzel, Barbra Pierce, Michael Fink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv06765
Plaintiff:
Emily Pierce
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GAMMON vs CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE GAMMON
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and KENNETH PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hare v. BeReal S.A.S.
as 1:2023cv04974
Plaintiff:
Pierce Hare
Defendant:
BeReal S.A.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
