Cases 31 - 40 of 173
Amos v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv02159
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Correction and Thomas Dart
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Amos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulford v. Heatherly et al
as 3:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Amos Fulford
Defendant:
S. Benton, Administrative Review Board, S. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulford v. Prisoner Review Board et al
as 3:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Amos Fulford
Defendant:
Prisoner Review Board, J. Fricker, T. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaiser v. Steuben County Jail
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Kaiser
Defendant:
Steuben County Jail, Kori Willcox, Roy Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos v. United Parcel Service, Incorporated
as 3:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Brian Amos
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chairs v. Wexford Healthcare Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00244
Defendant:
Dr Frost, Dr. Williams, Dr Obasi and others
Plaintiff:
Amos Chairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal et al v. Watson
as 3:2021cv00139
Petitioner:
Robert Sullivan, Terrence Wright, Roderick Whittaker and others
Respondent:
Sheriff Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Shan Collins, C.O. Reed, Sgt. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Miller, Terrell Amerson, Paul Donley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos Financial, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2021cv00558
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Amos Financial, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Isabella Dellarossa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schwartz et al v. Adams County Regional Sewer District
as 1:2021cv00014
Plaintiff:
Roman Schwartz, Amos Schwartz, Eli Hilty and others
Defendant:
Adams County Regional Sewer District
Not Classified By Court:
Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
