Cases 31 - 40 of 342
Lockridge v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
Chaney Sinclair Lockridge
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County, R&P Property Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dawson v. Olmstead
as 3:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
Lance Patrick Dawson, Jr
Defendant:
Russell Olmstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gavnichaux v. Dawson et al
as 1:2022cv01370
Plaintiff:
Dominique Gavnichaux
Defendant:
. Dawson, . Brown and . Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
Fyance Dawson
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Robert Schultz, Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Lee v. Bruce Ippel, et al
as 22-2711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor, LORETTA DAWSON and HOLLY DENMAN
Brazelton v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01324
Plaintiff:
Rodney Brazelton
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Chris Watkins, Susan Brobston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Garner v. Sheriff Key, et al
as 22-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF KEY, Lake County, (Badge #488), PEGGY KATONA, Lake County Treasurer, RICHARD J. DAWSON, Attorney and others
Garner v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Key, Peggy Katona, Richard James Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Garner v. Peggy Katona, et al
as 22-2495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
PEGGY KATONA, JOHN PETALAS, RICHARD J. DAWSON and others
Havrilla et al v. Centene Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv04126
Plaintiff:
Matthew Havrilla, Cynthia Dawson, Alden Henriksen and others
Defendant:
Centene Corporation, Centene Management Company LLC and Celtic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
