Cases 31 - 40 of 508
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wetzel v. Sangraw
as 2:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
Dustin R Wetzel
Defendant:
Zachary Sangraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hablutzel v. Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv03375
Plaintiff:
Scott M Hablutzel
Defendant:
Fayette County Illinois, Fayette County, IL Sheriffs Dept, Ronnie Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hablutzel v. Fayette County et al
as 3:2023cv03370
Plaintiff:
Scott M Hablutzel
Defendant:
Fayette County, Fayette County Sheriffs Dept, Vandalia Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hablutzel v. Fayette County IL et al
as 3:2023cv03372
Plaintiff:
Scott M Hablutzel
Defendant:
Fayette County IL, Fayette County Sheriffs Dept IL, Vandalia Police Dept IL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hablutzel v. Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv03371
Plaintiff:
Scott M Hablutzel
Defendant:
Fayette County Illinois, Fayette County Sheriffs Dept, Vandalia Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. K-Mac Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03315
Plaintiff:
Dustin Green
Defendant:
K-Mac Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
RUMLER v. CENTURION MEDICAL et al
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE RUMLER
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL, KIM HOSSON, S. BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAPLES v. ELAM et al
as 1:2023cv01695
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAPLES
Defendant:
DUSTIN ELAM and WAYNE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Walker et al
as 3:2023cv03275
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mendoza
Defendant:
Mike Walker, Misty Vaughn, Stephen Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
