Cases 31 - 40 of 348
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, M. BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellenburg v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 1:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lamar Ellenburg
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Warden Jon Noble and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allums et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01632
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar Allums and Kristie C. Allums
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grady v. St Joesph County Jail
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Deshannon Lamar Grady, Sr
Defendant:
St Joesph County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v Knutson
as 2:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Lamar Robinson and Martell Rogers
Defendant:
Grace E Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sitzes et al v. Elyea et al
as 1:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Clayton W Sitzes, Ryan Mills, Patrick Murphy and others
Defendant:
Willard O Elyea, Michael Puisis, Steven Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LAMAR JOHNSON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lamar Wilmington v. Tarry Williams
as 23-1582
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMAR WILMINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden
Gipson v. Truitt et al
as 1:2023cv01835
Plaintiff:
Virgil Lamar Gipson
Defendant:
Charles Truit and Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
