Cases 41 - 50 of 316
Henry Gill v. J.B. Pritzker, et al
as 22-1162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY GILL
Defendant / Appellee:
J.B. PRITZKER, CRAIG FINDLEY, ANGIE ASHBROCK and others
Smith et al v. Warden et al
as 2:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Osuntoka Smith, Andre D Hansbrough, Toney Davis and others
Defendant:
Warden, D Blackburn, Justin Segerstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. OT Growth Partners LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Anna Gill
Defendant:
OT Growth Partners LLC and Ultimate Fitness Group LLC doing business as OrangeTheory Fitness
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gill v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Henry Gill
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Craig Findley, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2021cv01337
Plaintiff:
Henry Gill
Defendant:
J. B. Pritzker, Craig Findley, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnside v. Cusak et al
as 1:2021cv01294
Plaintiff:
Brian A Burnside
Defendant:
Timothy Cusak, Chris Frederickson, Albert Purham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL et al v. LVI GLOBAL, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00338
Plaintiff:
KARAN GILL, HYE YOON and CRYSTAL NASSOURI
Defendant:
LVI GLOBAL, LLC, D/B/A LAS VEGAS INSTITUTE, STEVE GALELLA, D.D.S., ORTHOMATRIX CORP., INC. ALSO D/B/A FACIAL BEAUTY INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. Kedzierski et al
as 2:2021cv01154
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Anna Kedzierski, Kevin Mauthe, Veronica Solecki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Beasle et al
as 3:2021cv00665
Plaintiff:
Audrain Jones
Defendant:
Beasle, Ron Neal, Winn and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gills v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2021cv04166
Plaintiff:
Jaryan Gills
Defendant:
Robert Hamilton, . Decker, . Argo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
