Cases 41 - 50 of 77
United States of America v. $97,367.40 U.S. Currency
as 3:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$97,367.40 United States Currency
Claimant:
J&L Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health & Welfare Fund Trustees of the et al v. Browning Contracting Services Inc
as 4:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health & Welfare Fund Trustees of the and Local Union No 2 United Union of Roofers Waterproofers and Allied Workers Supplemental Pension Plan Trustees of the
Defendant:
J L Brown Contracting Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Diaz v. Lawery et al
as 1:2012cv01116
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz
Defendant:
M Lawery, J L Berry, Troy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L. v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00373
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
J. L. L., JR.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jeffery McCrory v. Randy Tracy, et al
as 11-2932
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY MCCRORY
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY TRACY, Detective, J. L. SENSENEY, Officer, BRAD MCCLAIN, Officer and others
Jeffery McCrory v. Anderson Police Department, et al
as 11-2886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY MCCRORY
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, R. TRACY, Officer, J. L. SENSENEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00219
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Lane et al v. Kozenczak et al
as 1:2011cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lane , Stephanie Lane , T. L. and others
Defendant:
Kozenczak, Hamala, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRORY v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2011cv00086
Defendant:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPT., SHAD B. GRILE, J. L. SENSENEY and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY MCCRORY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
