Cases 41 - 50 of 2,422
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Muhamed Abduba Dida and Mohamed Abduba Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre and Rosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Mohamed Dida
Respondent:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCLUSKY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MCCLUSKY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flak v. Veltus et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Flak, Jr
Defendant:
Brandon Veltus, Kimberly Loehrke, William T Jeronimo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Brianna Racquel Mitchell
Defendant:
Marc D. Smith, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services and Kimberly Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lovejoy v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03017
Plaintiff:
Laurence Lovejoy
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, Tara Goins, Shana Clarkson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michael E Williams and Kimberly K Williams
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre, Dr. Larson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pufahl, Kimberly et al v. Ward, Kimberly et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kimberly L. Pufahl and Jered E. Franke
Defendant:
Kimberly J. Ward, Diane Fronk (Franke) and Ayla Fronk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
