Cases 41 - 50 of 845
Stull, Brandon v. Spanbauer, Kobe et al
as 3:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Brandon Phillip Stull
Defendant:
Parole Officer Kobe Spanbauer, Supervisor Shonie L. Foy and Marc M. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Marc Reeder
as 23-2121
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARC B. REEDER
CDM PROPERTY GROUP LLC et al v. UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
CDM PROPERTY GROUP LLC and MARC CAITO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Abre Jackson v. Marc Anastacio, et al
as 23-1737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRE JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARC ANASTACIO, LAITH ELHAJ, SHADI J. AWAD and others
Abre Jackson v. Marc Anastacio, et al
as 23-1703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRE JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARC ANASTACIO, LAITH ELHAJ, SHADI J. AWAD and others
REEDER v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
MARC BEREN REEDER
Defendant:
TASHA TAYLOR, BRETT WITTER, MARK MCCLEESE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lewis v. Gorenc et al
as 2:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Stephen S Lewis
Defendant:
Marc Gorenc, Nancy Joseph, Laura Kwaterski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Dominique C Acevedo
Defendant:
Marc D Smith, Kamitha Madkins and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Marc D. Smith and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Acevedo v. Trent Law Firm et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Trent Law Firm and Marc P. Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
