Cases 41 - 50 of 1,661
Washington v. Martinez
as 1:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Terron Darnell Washington
Defendant:
Iris Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
USA v. Juan Guajardo-Martinez
as 24-1144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN GUAJARDO-MARTINEZ
Gamez et al v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
Roberto Gamez and Edward Barboza
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, N Rafferty, D Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Edwards v. Martinez et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Martinez M Edwards
Defendant:
Sgt Martinez, CO Pashh, Health Service Unit Assistant Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Crook et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Katie Crook, Daniel Martinez, Gabe Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Corey Joseph A. Shaw
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Erin Stokes, Jacob Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Oronoz Rodriguez, Pabon Charneco, Rivera Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez Jimenez v. Cafe Basil Groups, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Mayco Daniel Martinez Jimenez
Defendant:
Cafe Basil Groups, LLC, April Mankiewicz, Basil Group I, LLC and others
Dyson v. Stevens et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, Danielle Tucker, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
