Cases 41 - 50 of 270
Murphy v. Wilks et al
as 1:2022cv03673
Plaintiff:
Joseph Murphy
Defendant:
Justin Wilks, Lt. Nolan and Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Spin Master Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv03471
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Sensfun background Store, Shop127735 Store and others
Plaintiff:
Spin Master, Inc. and Spin Master Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nazirov v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2021cv06033
Plaintiff:
Kodirjon Nazirov
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Nolan v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2021cv01316
Petitioner:
Aldridge Nolan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Isom v. Neal et al
as 2:2021cv00231
Petitioner:
Kevin Isom
Respondent:
Ron Neal and Indiana State Prison
Not Classified By Court:
Shawn Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fattah et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv03681
Plaintiff:
Jatinder Fattah and Ranjit Singh
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Wagner v. Varga et al
as 3:2021cv50150
Defendant:
Mr. Remmers, Mr. Nolan, Michael Lowe and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gueco et al v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
as 1:2021cv01467
Defendant:
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Jeana Gueco and Nolan Gueco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Aldridge Nolan
as 21-1738
Defendant / Appellant:
ALDRIDGE NOLAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
