Cases 41 - 50 of 76
McGinty v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00014
Petitioner:
Raven McGinty
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDWARDS et al v. HARRISON COLLEGE et al
as 1:2018cv03170
Plaintiff:
DARYANE SHADDAY, MELISSA SHAFFER, CHRISTOPH WEBER and others
Defendant:
CRAIG PFANNENSTIEHL, HARRISON COLLEGE, EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
ALLISON RANDLE, ASHLEY BRYANT, REBECCA NAUE and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Lemke v. Allen et al
as 3:2018cv01883
Defendant:
Unknown Advanced Correctional Healthcare Employees, Unknown Jefferson County Employees, Unknown Jeffferson County Correctional Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Rowland Daniel Lemke
Respondent:
John Flick, Kim Bouser, Ferdinand Apostol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Vance-Curzen et al
as 2:2018cv01099
Respondent:
Ian F Vance-Curzen and Attorney Brad Schmeil
Petitioner:
Raven Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortiz v. Epperson et al
as 1:2018cv03385
Plaintiff:
Tommy Ray Ortiz
Defendant:
Bill Epperson, Carter, Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Milwaukee County Courthouse et al
as 2:2018cv00631
Plaintiff:
Raven Griffin
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Courthouse , Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office , Tara Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2535
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Raven Griffin v. Brad Schimel, et al
as 17-2033
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAVEN GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
BRAD D. SCHIMEL and IRENE E. PARTHUM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00648
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Griffin v. Parthaum et al
as 2:2017cv00338
Petitioner:
Raven Griffin
Respondent:
Irene Parthaum and Brad Schmeil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
