Cases 51 - 60 of 553
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00424
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Gailpeau et al
as 3:2019cv00994
Defendant:
M White, Officer Harrington, Herr and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Martin
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad EL v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv05635
Defendant:
James A. Shapiro, Curtis Weathersby, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Nobele Antoine Muhammad EL and Noble Antoine Muhammad EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marcus Harrington v. Derek Duszak, et al
as 19-2379
Defendant / Appellee:
DEREK DUSZAK, Chicago Police Officer, Star #10658 and JAMIE WEBER, Chicago Police Office, Star #19588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS HARRINGTON
Schrock v. Aramark LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00510
Defendant:
John(s) or Jane(s) Does, Captain Smiley, Ofc Rojo and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Schrock, Jr
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYSTEMS PLANT SERVICES, INC. v. HARRINGTON et al
as 1:2019cv02544
Defendant:
DAVID HARRINGTON and BLAIR MECHANICAL, LLC
Plaintiff:
SYSTEMS PLANT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00447
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Kim Butler, Richard Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, David Childers, Salvador Godinez and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00445
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, A Johnson, Officer Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
