Cases 61 - 70 of 554
Smith et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv03342
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith and Joshua D Warner
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams vs. United States of America
as 1:2020cv05237
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Mr Malcom Adams
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Rahoi v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2020cv01289
Plaintiff:
Mark E Rahoi
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvan et al v. Mnuchin et al
as 1:2020cv04511
Plaintiff:
Patrick Taylor and John Galvan
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Charles P. Rettig, Steven T. Mnuchin and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Robert Shapiro v. IRS, et al
as 20-2013
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON, INC., POSTMATES, TARGET and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SHAPIRO
Doe, Jane v. Trump, Donald et al
as 3:2020cv00430
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Mitch McConnell, U.S. Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Strack v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2020cv00563
Defendant:
John Koskinen, Internal Revenue Service, Jacob J Lew and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Strack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 4:2020cv00136
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Does v. Trump et al
as 2:2020cv00704
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Senator Mitch McConnell, Senator Charles Schumer and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CROSSBOW HOLDINGS LLC v. WIGGLES et al
as 1:2020cv00413
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF BARBARA J. WIGGLES, US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ASHLEY WIGGLES and others
Plaintiff:
CROSSBOW HOLDINGS, LLC and CROSSBOW HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
