Cases 61 - 70 of 3,385
Taylor v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00521
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Barbara K Taylor
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ryan Steinhoff v. Matthew Malovrh, et al
as 24-1252
Plaintiff:
RYAN STEINHOFF
Defendant:
MATTHEW MALOVRH, CLARK COUNTY, WISCONSIN, CHARLES RAMBERG and others
TAYLOR et al v. SHIVELY et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW TAYLOR
Defendant:
LESLIE C. SHIVELY, ROBERT PIGMAN, MARY MARGARET LLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
ARNOLD v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. ARNOLD, JR.
Defendant:
DANIELLE BRADFORD, TAYLOR BAUGH, JEFFREY PEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor and Kennado Kinte Taylor
Defendant:
John Doe, Gonzalez, Sgt Bogdala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. St Joesph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Rodney G Taylor and Rodney Grant Taylor
Defendant:
St Joesph County Jail and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Kristen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. US Department of Veterans Affairs
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
David Taylor
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
