Cases 71 - 80 of 228
Askew v. LaSalle County et al
as 1:2019cv00280
Defendant:
Ronald Marconi, DREW LENGFELDER, Thomas Templeton and others
Plaintiff:
ZANDREA ASKEW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crum & Forster, Specialty Insurance Company v. Chicago Truth, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07596
Defendant:
Darron Byrd, Edward Stephens, Ronald Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Crum & Forster, Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Tate et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv07439
Defendant:
Jennifer Burmistrz, James D. Cascone, Michael Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Legend Booth, E'Monie Booth, Ebony Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv01687
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Eva Marie Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2018cv01854
Plaintiff:
Kristin Higgins
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. WALLACE et al
as 4:2018cv00159
Defendant:
JONATHON SIMPSON, D.J. MOTE, KURTIS WALLACE and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. TIPSORD et al
as 1:2018cv01867
Defendant:
SHAWN HIGGINS and MICHAEL L. TIPSORD
Plaintiff:
ALFRED L. STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Winchester v. Illinois Republican Party et al
as 3:2018cv01137
Plaintiff:
Robert Winchester
Defendant:
Illinois Republican Party , Shaun Murphy, Judy Diekelman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
