Cases 71 - 80 of 161
Boutte' v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Aramark, Miami Correctional Facility, Judges and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Scott Boutte'
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENT v. INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv01928
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and THE GEO GROUP INC.
Plaintiff:
DELMAR J. KENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT-BERRY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01828
Plaintiff:
JAVON CROCKET-BERRY and JAVON CROCKETT-BERRY
Defendant:
OFFICER CYBORSKI, DR. CABRERA, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLINS v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01698
Defendant:
FOWLER, JESSICA KENAKHAM, STURGEON and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LESTER v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2020cv01410
Defendant:
ADAMS, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, WORTH and others
Plaintiff:
DEAJAY LESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATES v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00875
Defendant:
M. SEVIER, GEO GROUP INC., M. CECIL and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2020cv00796
Plaintiff:
TYLER ALLEN CRAWFORD
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC. and MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gozo v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv01754
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Homeland Security and GEO Group Inc.
Petitioner:
Makusha Gozo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crawford v. Sevier et al
as 3:2020cv00217
Plaintiff:
Tyler Allen Crawford
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc and Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF DEMARIO THOMAS v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00592
Defendant:
EMILY SCUDDER, JACK HOOD, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF DEMARIO THOMAS, DECEASED, BY ITS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, ROMONDO THOMAS and ESTATE OF DEMARIO THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
