Cases 81 - 90 of 333
Lemon v. Aurora Health Care North Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00357
Defendant:
Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund, Dr. Jeffrey Schroeder, Aurora Health Care North, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Shamora Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey et al v. Takach et al
as 4:2021cv00018
Defendant:
LIBERTY TRUCK AND TRAILER SALES AND LEASING, LLC, MELTON TRUCK LINES, INC., SCOTT TAKACH and others
Plaintiff:
MARY MARGARET BAILEY and ROBERT BAILEY
Not Classified By Court:
Pete Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schroeder v. Bonanza Gold Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00058
Plaintiff:
Michael Schroeder and Michael J. Schroeder
Defendant:
Bonanza Gold Trucking, Inc. and John Patrick Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2020cv01906
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Sgt Schroeder and Sgt Kinnard
Plaintiff:
Jonathon M Mark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Carr et al
as 1:2020cv01735
Defendant:
E Toney, Sgt Hudson, Sgt Schroeder and others
Plaintiff:
Ted Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandra Nigl v. Cathy Jess, et al
as 20-3112
Defendant / Appellee:
DAWN CRIM, DANIEL SCHROEDER, DEDE MORGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA K. NIGL, formerly know as SANDRA K. JOHNSTON, PH. D
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06321
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Schroeder v. Northwestern University
as 1:2020cv06198
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Schroeder
Defendant:
Northwestern University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schroeder v. City of Muskego
as 2:2020cv01066
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schroeder
Defendant:
City of Muskego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Jess et al
as 2:2020cv01069
Defendant:
Neau Roberts, HSAM Fofana, Lt Christoper and others
Plaintiff:
Terrelle D Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
