Cases 1 - 10 of 811
Connolly et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Connolly and Bryan Fisher
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Yoquelet v. Noble County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Yoquelet
Defendant:
Noble County Sheriffs Department, Jenny Cummins and Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Louis Lee Fisher
Defendant:
Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Arnold v. Kevin Gillis, et al
as 24-1964
Plaintiff:
JASON P. ARNOLD
Defendant:
KEVIN GILLIS, JOSH CHRISTMAN, WILLIAM FISHER and others
Fisher v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Louis Lee Fisher
Defendant:
Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Fisher et al
as 2:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jamaine Brown
Defendant:
Lt Fisher, Captain Remarkiwitcz, Warden Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTHRAUFF v. CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
MARK RUTHRAUFF
Defendant:
CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC., CENTURION, LLC., STEPHANY LYNNE RILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher o/b/o A.L.M., a minor, o/b/o Edwin Maldonado, deceased, et al
as 1:2024cv04127
Plaintiff:
Amanda Fisher o/b/o A.L.M., a minor, o/b/o Edwin Maldonado, deceased, and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Chase v. Rebecca Fisher Law Firm et al
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Linda C Chase
Defendant:
Rebecca Fisher Law Firm and Rebecca L Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
