Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Carr v. Zoerner et al
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
David Zoerner, DSO Aker, DSO Molinaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Aker et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Wright
Defendant:
CO Aker, CO Westburg, E Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Simmons
as 3:2023cv02505
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Jason Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Akers v. Hill
as 3:2023cv01722
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Kathy S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Akers v. Simpkins
as 3:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Nathan Simpkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Akers v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv02469
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Dan Sproul, A. McCaffery, G. Soza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Simpkins
as 3:2022cv02192
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Nathan Simpkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aker et al v. Homesite Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Jake Aker and Dawn Sibley
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company Of The Midwest and Homesite Insurance Agency, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
