Cases 1 - 10 of 1,717
STILL v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALAN STILL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
De Novo Inc. v. Beitner
as 1:2024cv04281
Plaintiff:
De Novo Inc.
Defendant:
Jonathan Alan Beitner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
TAYLOR v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00853
Petitioner:
CHAD ALAN TAYLOR
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENSON et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
LEON BENSON and KOLLEEN BUNCH
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ALAN F. JONES, LESLIE VANBUSKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alan Wyman v. Christine Brannon-Dortch
as 24-1871
Petitioner:
ALAN WYMAN
Respondent:
CHRISTINE BRANNON-DORTCH, Warden
Lien v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01291
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Alan Lien
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARR et al v. TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ALAN CARR and DAVID G. SCHUSTER
Defendant:
TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blakely v. Clearly Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01172
Plaintiff:
Alan Blakely
Defendant:
Clearly Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Whitetail Ridge Trust CTO et al v. Benge et al
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Whitetail Ridge Trust CTO and Heavens Door Trust CTO
Defendant:
John Joseph Benge, Dr Keith Davis, Traci Thrap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BOLIN v. TELL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. BOLIN
Defendant:
TELL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JASON SHADWICK, BRYCE HAMMACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
