Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
COTTRELL v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2018cv00200
Defendant:
MIKE HAMMOND, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BRAD JONES and others
Plaintiff:
GREG COTTRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Galletti et al
as 1:2018cv02623
Plaintiff:
Juwaun R Hodges
Defendant:
Mike Galletti, John Morscheiser, Ed Jauch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS et al v. CLARK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2018cv00050
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, CLARK COUNTY JAIL, DIRECTOR SCOTT CONLEN and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS M. JONES, SHAWN DRIE R. PRATT and TERRELL L. ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMBS v. CLARK COUNTY et al
as 4:2018cv00001
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, CLARK COUNTY, CONLEN and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DANIEL COMBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. CLARK COUNTY et al
as 4:2017cv00233
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, B. BOWER, CLARK COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. NOEL et al
as 4:2017cv00206
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, BOLEY, BOWER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orochem Technologies, Inc. v. Whole Hemp Company, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06983
Plaintiff:
Orochem Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Whole Hemp Company, LLC , Kashif Shan , Raj Gupta and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
DUNN v. JONES et al
as 4:2017cv00173
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, CONLIN, HOWARD and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ANDREW DUNN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00360
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
BRAD JONES
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
