Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Portis v. Whiting
as 1:2023cv16089
Plaintiff:
Charles Portis
Defendant:
Brian P. Whiting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Brian Cook
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN P. COOK
Brian Brandolino, et al v. Douglas Schlak
as 22-1525
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN P. BRANDOLINO, an Individual, BRUCE D. BRANDOLINO, an Individual and BRAD A. BRANDOLINO, an Individual
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS W. SCHLAK, doing business as DOUGLAS W. SCHLAK & ASSOCIATES
WILLIAMS v. LAMMER
as 2:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
KEVIN KUNLAY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRIAN P. LAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WILLIAMS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2019cv00158
Plaintiff:
BARBARA C. WILLIAMS and BRIAN P. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv02151
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brian P Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shaffier v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv04099
Petitioner:
Michael R. Shaffier, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Material Witne:
Brian P. Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
K. et al v. MARION COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv01521
Plaintiff:
BRIAN P., ALEXA C., RACHEL H. and others
Defendant:
LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA, MARK A. JONES, JASON M. MOUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K. et al v. MARION COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 3:2019cv00025
Plaintiff:
L. R., R. S., N. K. and others
Defendant:
LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, SCOTT COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dolezar v. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Brian Dolezar and Brian P Dolezar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
